Page Not Found
Page not found. Your pixels are in another canvas.
A list of all the posts and pages found on the site. For you robots out there is an XML version available for digesting as well.
Page not found. Your pixels are in another canvas.
About me
This is a page not in th emain menu
Published:
This post will show up by default. To disable scheduling of future posts, edit config.yml
and set future: false
.
Published:
This is a sample blog post. Lorem ipsum I can’t remember the rest of lorem ipsum and don’t have an internet connection right now. Testing testing testing this blog post. Blog posts are cool.
Published:
This is a sample blog post. Lorem ipsum I can’t remember the rest of lorem ipsum and don’t have an internet connection right now. Testing testing testing this blog post. Blog posts are cool.
Published:
This is a sample blog post. Lorem ipsum I can’t remember the rest of lorem ipsum and don’t have an internet connection right now. Testing testing testing this blog post. Blog posts are cool.
Published:
This is a sample blog post. Lorem ipsum I can’t remember the rest of lorem ipsum and don’t have an internet connection right now. Testing testing testing this blog post. Blog posts are cool.
Short description of portfolio item number 1
Short description of portfolio item number 2
Published in International Security, 2021
Summary: We propose opportunistic repression as a framework for understanding repression under authoritarian regimes. We test our argument by studying patterns of state violence against civilians in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, which created a window of opportunity for dictators to use force against opposition figures under the auspice of public health.
Recommended citation: Donald Grasse, Melissa Pavlik, Hilary Matfess, Travis B. Curtice (2021). "Opportunistic Repression: Civilian Targeting by the State in Response to COVID-19." International Security (2021) 46 (2): 130–165. https://direct.mit.edu/isec/article/46/2/130/107696/Opportunistic-Repression-Civilian-Targeting-by-the
Published in Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2022
When do agricultural transformations impact social stability? Cash crops are typically associated with economic prosperity and social peace. I argue agricultural booms may spur violent conflict over resource allocation by pitting would-be producers against incumbent landowners when the gains from production are concentrated and the negative externalities are diffuse. I study the rapid expansion of oil palm in Indonesia, a growingly important crop in the global economy. I find when oil palm grows more valuable and expands within producing districts, violent resource conflicts increase. The positive relationship does not exist for other cash crops, nor other types of conflict, and is moderated by the presence of sustainability certified processing mills. The results connect commodity shocks to non-state violence over resources, and suggest land use change is an important mechanism connecting agricultural booms to social conflict.
Recommended citation: Grasse, Donald. (2022). "Oil Crops and Social Conflict: Evidence from Indonesia"; Journal of Conflict Resolution. Volume: 66 Issue: 7-8, page(s): 1422-1448. http://donaldgrasse.github.io/files/crops-conflict-2022-accepted.pdf
Published in American Political Science Review (Accepted), 2022
Abstract: Does mass repression have a long-term economic legacy, and if so, what explains persistence? I argue repression can undermine development by delimiting human capital. I study the aftermath of the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia. The regime implemented a campaign of violence to reorganize society, yet governing elites varied across the communist ideological spectrum. I exploit an arbitrary border that allocated villages to either the loyalist Mok or the relatively moderate Sy in Kampong Speu province. Using a regression discontinuity design, I find villages in the more extremist Southwest zone are poorer today compared to villages in the adjacent West zone, and had lower human capital immediately after the regime. Exposure to more intense repression shapes labor markets and child health, explaining intergenerational persistence. I find no conclusive evidence for other persistence channels. My findings add a novel pathway to the library of mechanisms which explain why historical coercion undermines development.
Recommended citation: Grasse, Donald (2022). "Developmental Legacies of Draconian Dictatorship: Evidence from the Khmer Rouge." Working Paper. http://donaldgrasse.github.io/files/state-terrror-long-term-development-grasse-apsr.pdf
Published in Conditionally Accepted, International Organization, 2024
Rebels regularly provide public services - especially legal services - but the consequences of such programs are unclear. We argue rebel courts can boost civilian support for insurgency and augment attack capacity by increasing the legitimacy of the rebellion, creating a vested interest in rebel rule, or by enabling rebel coercion of the civilian population. We study the impact of the Taliban’s judiciary by leveraging cross-district and overtime variation in exposure to Taliban courts using a trajectory balancing design. We find courts reduced civilian support for the government and increased support for the Taliban, and were associated with more attacks and coalition casualties. Exploring mechanisms, we find courts resolved major interpersonal disputes between civilians, facilitated more insurgent intimidation of civilians, and that changes in public opinion are unlikely to have been driven solely through social desirability bias. Our findings help explain the logic of rebel courts and highlight the complex interactions between warfare and institutional development in weak states.
Recommended citation: Donald Grasse, Renard Sexton, Austin Wright "Courting Civilians During Conflict: Evidence from Taliban Judges in Afghanistan" https://donaldgrasse.github.io/files/Courting_Civilians_During_Conflict__Evidence_from_Taliban_Judges_in_Afghanistan.pdf
Undergraduate course, Emory University, Political Science, 2020
Course Descrpition: This course offers an introduction to the comparative study of modern political systems. It outlines a number of the major theories of comparative political analysis and applies to them to a selection of democratic, authoritarian, and hybrid systems. It examines how these systems function internally and how they interact with their societies, economies, and international environments, as well as how they change over time and how they undergo transitions from one tyepe to another.
Masters course, University of Chicago, MSCAPP, 2023
Download syllabus here Download Lecture 1 here Download Lecture 2 here Download Lecture 3 here Download Lecture 4 here Download Lecture 5 here Download Lecture 6 here Download Lecture 7 here Download Lecture 8 here